"A long run approach towards Peace in the Middle East Changing Economic Structures"

 

 

 

 



Michael Barnea
Jerusalem, February 24th, 2003

 

 

The “Intifada” put an almost complete stop to the economic development of the West Bank and Gaza, disintegrating the fragile tissues of an independent state in creation. This is reflected in a negative rate of growth, an incredibly high rate of unemployment, poverty and other high- impact social costs with severe consequences. At the same time it exacerbated the recession trends in the Israeli economy due to the international conditions in the hi-tech markets, reinforcing the slowdown in growth and investments.

A political settlement between Israel and a Palestinian state in the near future seems now quite plausible. Mounting pressure by the United States and other major countries are highly probable. The parties concerned seem now more than ever eager to yield to such pressures as the hostilities claim an intolerable toll.

As the West Bank and Gaza strip economy has hardly developed to provide even a minimal standard of living, massive international economic aid is likely to be channeled to foster the peace process.

In the early stages of the “post-Oslo” period such aid did not create a momentum of development for a variety of reasons, including allegedly a large misappropriation of funds. Ultimately the main source of Palestinians economic income, directly and indirectly, was their employment in Israel, mostly in agriculture, construction and services and to some extent some other services and commodities exported to Israel.

A long lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians depends not only on the termination of war, border fortifications, signature of peace treaty and international guarantees. A sustainable peace between nations that experienced long and bitter hostilities requires adequate national policies and cooperation to cope with its natural fragility.

Economic cooperation is one of the major fields needed to strengthen the process and make it viable in the long run. The resumption of free trade between Israel and a future Palestinian State is certainly one form of such cooperation, which can produce immediate dividends to both countries. But it should be kept in mind that the major commodity exported to Israel-labor-has a very limited potential for several reasons. First, Israel is still experiencing economic recession. Secondly, Palestinian workers were replaced by a large inflow of foreign workers, legal and illegal, whose numbers already exceed 300,000 people. Thirdly, the long hostilities produced a natural reluctance to employ Palestinians.

One may well pose the question to what extent the employment of Palestinians in Israel, as a major commodity in their trade is beneficial to both sides in the long run. The same question applies to importing cheap labor indirectly, via commodities produced on Palestinian soil with a high content of cheap labor. It has been said that such patterns of trade between nations are the "Grapes of Wrath" of the globalization. They are considered a form of "social dumping” that tends to perpetuate the underdevelopment of the low-income states keeping wages at their lowest levels and depriving the workers of minimal social benefits. While such economic relations may exist between distant countries, it is already clear that they are not compatible with a sustained peace process between neighboring Israelis and Palestinians .It has already been said that the Palestinians became "hewers of wood and drawers of water" of the Israelis. True or false, it is obvious that a durable peace requires a more balanced structure of economic relations. Restoring the pre-Intifada structure of economic relations between the two nations will therefore not serve the cause of peace in the long run.

Being endowed with large resources of human capital and advanced technologies, Israel became in recent years a leading factor in the hi-tech industries worldwide, boosting considerably its exports and attracting large foreign investments. The recent plunge of the hi-tech markets in the world had a severe impact on the Israeli economy, reducing the rate of growth and increasing unemployment. For the first time in its economic history unemployment reached the most skilled workers in the hi-tech sectors of the economy and it may take sometime to reintegrate this vast human capital. It is at this point that new opportunities arise as these temporary idle resources of hi-tech personnel can be utilized to begin a vast training process of young Palestinians who do not find professional employment upon completing their studies. Israel could allocate the vocational staff to train these Palestinians in hi-tech professions which would both offer new employment possibilities and foster their self-confidence to integrate in more sophisticated industries. No more "hewers of wood and drawers of water" in construction, agriculture and services but proud qualified high-tech engineers and technicians that could create a nucleus of such industries in the Palestinian state.

The creation of a large educational and vocational system would require large investments, which could be financed by major industrial countries, wealthy Arab countries, the World Bank and other organizations. Thus Israeli technology and hi-tech personnel plus international finance, could be utilized to make a change in a backward economy without hope to support its increasing population. This could serve to strengthen a long lasting peace and stability in this region.

 


© 2007 UPF